Region 2 Location Map

research, education and extension
Water QualityTrading
blue line dividing header from body of page

Regional Program Priority
Issue Areas


Animal Waste Management

Drinking Water and Human Health

Nutrient Management

Watershed Management

Regional Initiatives

Animal Waste Management for Small Farms

Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Management

Water Quality Trading

Watershed Management

Water Reuse

Success Stories

Regional
Advisory Committee

Programs by State/
Commonwealth/
Territory


Annual Meetings

Home

Previous Page

The following is a brief summary of the water quality issues, work to date, and capabilities associated with Water Quality Trading as a Tool to Improve Nutrient Management:

Numerous water bodies throughout Region 2 are impaired due to nitrogen and phosphorus. These impairments result form unregulated nonpoint sources, regulated point sources that have either minimal or no nutrient controls, as well as other sources including atmospheric deposition. For example, in New Jersey, a 1999 USGS statistical analysis of freshwater stream monitoring data found that at 63% of sampling stations total phosphorus concentrations resulted from a combination of both point and nonpoint sources. In response, regulatory agencies are implementing measures including: comprehensive watershed programs; TMDLs for impaired water bodies; watershed-based permitting; and nutrient discharge standards for entire classes of polluters. These measures can be augmented by trading programs that optimize the use of scarce resources within a watershed to achieve pollution reductions at lowest cost, with possible ancillary environmental benefits. Trading is an incentive-based approach that can take many forms. It can be initiated by a regulatory agency establishing an aggregate load allocation for a group of dischargers, and providing the option for facilities within the group to either make load reductions within their facilities, pay for more cost effective reductions at another facility or, for publicly owned facilities, participate in a process to allocate available public financing to facilities that can make least cost load reductions. Trading can also be carried out through bilateral contractual arrangements between regulated point sources and unregulated nonpoint sources. The point sources would provide funding for nonpoint sources to implement management practices that will effect equivalent pollution reductions at a lower cost then can be achieved by the point sources.

There is growing interest in water quality trading throughout the nation, with numerous projects underway. Also, there are substantial opportunities for water quality trading, as many sources contribute to nutrient loadings, control costs can vary substantially from one facility to another, and allowing one facility to continue to discharge nutrients in exchange for reductions at another site does not generally pose public health or water quality risks (as might be the case with toxic substances). However, there have been only a limited number of transactions executed, especially those occurring between point and nonpoint sources. To attract participants, programs must be structured to adequately address numerous, often locally-specific, complexities, including: calculating water quality benefits from point and nonpoint source load reductions; establishing equivalency factors; avoiding “hot spots;” and creating a structure for economically-sound transactions that minimize transaction costs while assuring stakeholders that water quality improvements will be achieved.

Region 2 is well suited to test water qualilty trading methodologies, as many areas contain a mix of rural/suburban land uses. These include point sources, such as municipal treatment plants, and nonpoint sources, such as agriculture, residential/commercial developments and roads. In the case of agriculture, funding made available through water quality trading programs can also serve to enhance farm income while providing resources to implement nonpoint source best management practices. This additional source of income can help small farms remain competitive.

This regional initiative has been established to aid local stakeholders to take advantage of trading opportunities. Through this effort, the LGUs in Region 2 will build capacity by applying research, education and extension expertise to identify and resolve impediments and develop and test incentive-based trading methodologies.

The Region 2 Water Quality Program began this initiative in November 2002 with the review of available literature on trading. Early in January 2003, with the release of EPA’s Trading Policy, the regional team met with EPA Region 2 management to craft a concept plan for the regional initiative. Interest in water quality trading had been expressed by several organizations in the region, including in a position paper on “Phosphorus Management of Agricultural Lands,” by the Agriculture Committee of the Raritan Basin Watershed Program in central New Jersey. The Raritan is a 1,100 square mile watershed with an intensive mix of land uses and a well-established watershed protection program. In response, the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station (NJAES) provided a grant to the State Water Quality Coordinator at Rutgers Cooperative Extension to identify phosphorus point-nonpoint trading opportunities within the Raritan Basin. The Raritan feasibility study identified 4 sub-watersheds within the Raritan as potential sites for a point–nonpoint source trading project.

To further the regional trading initiative, a full day session on trading was convened during the Region 2 Program annual meeting in June 2003. The keynote speaker was the Region 3 Program Coordinator (Tom Simpson, University of Maryland), who presented his experiences in water quality trading in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Also in June, the Region 2 Program aided EPA Region 2 in co-sponsoring a phosphorous management conference in New Jersey, by facilitating discussion of trading as an effective management tool. In November 2003, the findings of the Raritan study were presented to stakeholders during a regional trading initiative meeting. This work highlighted the role that could be played by the LGUs to advance trading within Region 2. As a result, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection requested that Rutgers prepare an EPA Watershed Initiative proposal to develop a water quality trading program for the Upper Passaic River Watershed in northern New Jersey. Discussions also have begun among UPR and Cornell faculty and state agency representatives to develop trading demonstration projects for those jurisdictions, also as elements of the regional trading initiative.

The Region 2 Program will test the use of online dialogue and collaboration to augment face-to-face interactions in engaging a wide array of stakeholders interested in the trading initiative. Discussions have begun with OnLine Learning International (OLLI), a subsidiary of Concord Consortium, a distance learning research foundation, to develop and test the trading initiative online dialogue process. The dialogue will engage academics, agency representatives and other interested parties to address issues and approaches in support of trading demonstration projects throughout the region. If successful, ongoing management of the online process will be maintained by Region 2 Program faculty and staff, and may be expanded to other Region 2 Program initiatives.

The LGUs in Region 2 bring a wealth of experience in water quality modeling, BMP design, implementation and evaluation, and the development of economic models to optimize the use of scarce resources within a watershed to improve water quality. Our key partner, EPA Region 2, also brings unique capabilities, having taken the lead in implementing the Long Island Sound Trading Program, one of the most successful trading programs in the nation. Building on the trust and reputation of our land grant institutions, the Region 2 Program has already convened a broad stakeholder group to explore trading feasibility in Region 2, and received a strong charge from the group to move forward in this area.

Project leads:

Christopher Obropta
Rutgers Cooperative Extension
14 College Farm Road
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8551
Phone: 732-932-9800 x 6209
Fax: 732-932-8644
obropta@envsci.rutgers.edu

Jeffrey Potent
Regional Program Coordinator /US EPA Region 2 Liaison/Senior Extension Associate Cornell University
US EPA Region 2
290 Broadway, 24th Floor
New York, New York 10007-1866
212 637-3857
212 637-3887 Fax
potent.jeffrey@epa.gov

blue line dividing footer from body of page